They Knew All Along
X has finally shown us the truth they saw years before we did
X added a tiny feature and accidentally exposed one of the biggest deceptions of the digital age. You tap “About this account” and suddenly the whole act collapses. You see when the profile was created, how many times the name was changed, what country the account is really posting from, and whether it is hiding behind a VPN. That is all. No intelligence training. No classified tools. One tap. And with that one tap you watch identities that shaped the Western conversation on Israel fall apart like cardboard.
The America First firebrand thundering about Israel was operating out of Saudi Arabia. The Gaza influencer insisting they were speaking from the heart of the conflict was in Turkey. A hard right account claiming to represent the wounded American working class was posting from Serbia. A supposedly homegrown activist account flew the stars and stripes while hiding behind a VPN mask that made its real location impossible to verify. It was the same story every time. We did not have to hunt for anomalies. We stumbled into them by accident. It’s impossible to grasp the scale of the manipulation.
The shock is not that trolls exist. The shock is how deeply these fakes penetrated the Western bloodstream. These accounts shaped how millions understood Israel, Jews, and the entire moral terrain of the Middle East. They poured fuel on antisemitism until it reached levels the postwar West has not seen in generations. They repackaged medieval lies. They revived blood slander. They convinced millions that Jewish self defense was oppression and that terror was liberation. They dragged the conversation into a moral pit where hatred felt righteous and truth felt inconvenient.
And the poison spread because powerful people carried it. That is the part no one wants to say out loud. Figures on the right and the left amplified these fraudulent accounts. Elon Musk shared them. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez shared them. Influencers and political personalities with massive audiences handed their platforms to operators sitting continents away. That combination gave synthetic voices real authority. It blurred the line between genuine outrage and imported agitation. It pulled these lies out of the shadows and lodged them into the heart of Western debate.
Now that the transparency feature exists, the panic among these networks is unmistakable. Accounts are shutting down before enough people can archive their histories. Some are trying to sell their profiles on black market channels so the brand can survive even if the original operator flees. Others are frantically deleting old posts, wiping away traces of the contradictions. Some are rebranding overnight and pretending nothing happened. They are not embarrassed. They are terrified. The trick they used for years was undone in a moment.
But the collapse of a few accounts does not mean the truth has won. Far from it. The hatred they unleashed does not vanish because the puppeteers got caught. The divisions they deepened inside political parties do not heal because the source was foreign. The conspiracies they seeded are now part of the emotional vocabulary of entire communities. A generation has been shaped by stories written in places they have never seen. The accounts may vanish but the anger they cultivated is still here.
Which brings us back to the core question. If we can uncover this with one tap, how long ago did the people in power see it. X’s own systems have always known. The algorithm sees everything. It sees device fingerprints. It sees posting rhythms no human could sustain. It sees when one operator is running multiple identities. It sees when a persona claims to be American but is posting from a device registered in the Gulf. It sees networks moving in coordinated clusters. It has had this information for years.
And the intelligence agencies have had even more. They monitor foreign traffic. They track coordinated bursts across regions. They map the flow of influence campaigns. They know which countries run which narratives. They know when something is organic and when it is manufactured. They have the data. They have the systems. They have watched this from the beginning.
So why was none of it stopped. Why did the platforms tolerate waves of foreign operators steering the emotional core of their own societies. Why did the agencies stay silent. Why did politicians look away while their citizens were manipulated by strangers. Why did everyone with the power to intervene decide the cost of action was greater than the cost of letting hatred metastasize.
The truth is not technological. The truth is moral. The platforms did not intervene because the chaos made them money. The agencies did not intervene because confronting the problem required political risk. The politicians did not intervene because the anger could be weaponized. Everyone with authority chose comfort over responsibility. Everyone tasked with protecting the West decided to let the West fend for itself.
This is the heart of the betrayal. The deception was not subtle. It was tolerated. The accounts were not hidden. They were indulged. The lies were not difficult to spot. They were ignored. If the public can uncover the truth by tapping a single line of text on a profile, then the platforms and the agencies knew long before we did. They saw the rot. They saw the hate. They saw the manipulation spreading. They watched as antisemitism roared back to life. They watched as political movements fractured. They watched as foreign agitators pushed Israel into the center of the Western culture war and used it to unmake the moral stability of entire nations.
Israel did not become the wedge on its own. It was chosen as the wedge because it carries a century of unresolved history and can fracture a society overnight. These foreign accounts did not invent the fault lines. They drove wedges into them until they cracked. And the people who should have stopped them watched it happen.
Now that the mask has dropped, the questions cannot be avoided. If these accounts were fake, then who built them. Who directed them. What governments, movements, or organizations were pulling the strings while pretending to be Americans, Gazans, activists, patriots, or workers. The exposure proves the activity was inorganic, but the scale is still unknown. Was this a loose constellation of opportunists, or a coordinated architecture designed to fracture the West from within. We deserve to know exactly what was whispering into our public square for the past several years.
And there is a harder truth waiting beneath it. This only came to light because a small feature slipped through. Not because the platforms chose integrity. Not because the agencies raised alarms. The exposure happened almost by accident. Which means that unless the public demands full transparency, we may never learn the real scope of the deception. The betrayal is no longer theoretical. The West was manipulated, and the people tasked with protecting the public either failed or looked away. The only path forward is a complete accounting of what they knew, when they knew it, and why they chose silence over action.
Because if one tap can reveal this much, imagine what would surface if the doors were opened all the way. Imagine the scale of the networks we have not yet seen. Imagine the number of identities still passing undetected through the bloodstream of the West. Accountability is not a slogan here. It is the only hope of repairing what these foreign operators shattered. Transparency is not optional. It is the minimum requirement for rebuilding trust. If the institutions refuse that reckoning, then the public will have to learn to defend itself without them. The era of pretending we were protected is over.
Editors Note: Removed a previous note stating that the feature had been disabled - it has been restored.







We need this feature on Substack. Good work, Guy. What say?
Intervention by non-Western media, bloggers, or online accounts in Western internal politics and the Western information space should be treated much like a military intervention. The information space isn’t so different from physical space: we welcome tourists, but we fight an invading army. In the same way, we should welcome free speech and open information — but we must push back against information warfare.